Follow-up Comment #18, task #15757 (project administration): [comment #17 comment #17:] > [comment #15 comment #15:] > > > > Again, this is a constant in GNU projects that use the Translation Project. > > I don't think this is correct.
For instance, https://translationproject.org/PO-files/fr/dfarc-3.14.fr.po is from a project that doesn't require copyright assignment to the FSF, yet it is copyright the FSF only (and for only 2008 and 2009, then nothing even though there are more recent changes). In https://translationproject.org/PO-files/es/dfarc-3.14.es.po, the copyright is associated with the first author, the others are simply listed. Since we never required copyright to be assigned to the FSF, I think it stays with the individual authors. Is that correct? In that case, would adding "Copyright" before each author be a good solution? Or maybe better, since weblate is using the same template as the TP (using the same copyright as the pot file, then listing individual authors): Copyright (c) YEAR the authors of guix (msgids) and the authors of this file (listed below). > > Alright, I fixed .gitignore and manifest.scm, but I copied CODE-OF-CONDUCT > > from the main Guix repo, where it does not have any license header either. > > If a file has no copyright and license notices, it's technically not just proprietary, it's unredistributable, making any copying a copyright violation. Sure. The file originally comes from https://www.contributor-covenant.org. I've added a license notice. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?15757> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
