Follow-up Comment #34, task #16067 (project administration): >> The internal discussion was resolved in January > > No, not completely.
The discussion about the last non-issues that were raised: * All ASCII files, even if they are generated or trivial must have a copyright header, * Examples included in the documentation need individual copyright headers, * A file longer than 10 lines is never trivial, * A README file cannot serve to describe the copyright and license of ASCII files, were resolved as being a much too strict--and wrong--interpretation of the guidelines. So from a Dezyne point of view, the discussion was resolved. > Something has happened. You know that there was a follow-up. The follow-up was meant to explain the above two points. Then, there was no remark on the explanation for over a week. There is also another thread about improving the maintainer guidelines and fixing this approval process. I do not see why that should hold up Dezyne, though. Yesterday, one more source file without a header was found. Of course, I corrected that promptly, added headers to three more similar c++ header files and I have uploaded a new tarball: https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/download.php?file_id=52825 Someone please approve Dezyne right now. Thanks. Greetings, Janneke _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16067> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/