Follow-up Comment #11, task#16485 (group administration): Hi Ineiev,
You are always writing in vague language. > Could you use a complete license notice as recommended in the GPL? I have complete LICENSE added from https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt What is complete gpl license in your view ? > There should be no ambiguities left about what copyright and > license notices applies to the image files and to README itself. I added README for image license. (Just, like other approved project in savannah.) Should I add another 2nd LICENSE file in my project to make things more confusing now ? > Then, I could point to the files that still lack the copyright and >license notices, but the tarball is so small that it shouldn't be >hard for you to find them. I already told you I checked and added license to all the files possible. Why can't you check now let me know, if there is anything missing. So, I can submit fix at once. I feel you are just wasting my time here. If you feel the project is not ready for savannah, you can reject it, and I will host it elsewhere. Thank you. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16485> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/