On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Karl Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > because I want a LGPL-like thing, with one restriction: > no derivatives. > > Such a restriction would make any license non-free, > so we can't accept that.
I agree with Karl on all the points, but have something to add. If you use (L)GPLv3, the license explicitly states that changing the license text is not allowed (before the preamble). In addition, it says that if there are any additional restrictions, they are to be ignored (section 7). Jan
