So. Why it seems to be not much activity on Savannah website? I'm not the only who noted this, and this question isn't only about Bash - it shouldn't be, although Bash is the starting point.
I didn't read the other message because it is among a bunch of spam, and apparently I skimmed throught its title without noting. Thank you for pointing it. -- Balaco On Mon, Jun 1, 2015, at 23:12, Bob Proulx wrote: > Hello Balaco, > > You have posted to the Savannah users mailing list. This is a mailing > list concerning operation of the Savannah freedom software forge. But > you are asking about Bash. Bash is a separate project. You should > write to the bash project maintainers if you want to discuss bash. > > I see you have already done this. Chet Ramey the bash maintainer > responded to your message. Did you not get his response? Your > original message and his response is here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-05/msg00027.html > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-05/msg00028.html > > There wasn't any follow-up from you in that mailing list. That is the > right place to talk about the bash project. Either to bug-bash or to > the help-bash mailing list. > > Bob > > > Balaco Baco wrote: > > About a year ago I reported an issue that I have known Bash has since > > years ago. No clear solution seems to exist, just work arounds some do > > for their specific cases. > > > > The issue is about duplicate history lines, even with erasedups active: > > > > https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?108530 > > > > My "solution" is the simple silly, but quite ashaming to say: use > > HIST*SIZE configs with muuuuch bigger values I would choose otherwise. > > But the issue makes the configuration pointless since I can't know how > > many lines of (different) lines my history really has - unless I > > carefully make/find a script or program to count it. But it should be > > the config number and that's all. > > > > The Savannah issue got no comment, pointer, or any apparent activity. So > > I decided to ask here. And the results can be everything, but no chance > > of being worse. So, why not? :) > > -- http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and folders wherever you are
