Bugs item #1494846, was opened at 2006-05-25 12:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sgimenez You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=591456&aid=1494846&group_id=89802
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Xavier Cazin (xaviercazin) Assigned to: David Baelde (dbaelde) Summary: switches keep falling back to the unfallible source Initial Comment: After having updated to revision 2467 (with ocaml 3.09.1), liquidsoap doesn't want to play sources other than the non fallible ones anymore. Here is an excerpt of the loop I now get: ... 1148553702,280720 [root:3] Broadcast starts up! 1148553702,305629 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3] switch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1148553702,306262 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3] switch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1148553702,306440 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3] switch to secure.ogg 1148553702,306562 [secure.ogg:3] Enabling caching mode (possible dynamic activation) 1148553812,901399 [secure.ogg:3] Finished with "/media/data1/playlists/secure.ogg" 1148553812,902510 [secure.ogg:3] Prepared "/media/data1/playlists/secure.ogg" -- rid 1 1148553923,521582 [secure.ogg:3] Finished with "/media/data1/playlists/secure.ogg" ... I've tried to checkout a fresh svn tree, with same results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephane Gimenez (sgimenez) Date: 2006-06-06 14:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=727197 btw, dynamic labels like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or âsecure.ogg" are just feature killers (that is, from my point of view, purely heretic). the idea was one can choose filtering levels for each kind of log message, dynamic data can be part of log message data, not of log labels. well anyway, maybe it's just a stupid feature⦠(and argh dirty localized float representations!â¦, is there a way to print floats in a universal representation? (yet, does even such a thing exist?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephane Gimenez (sgimenez) Date: 2006-06-06 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=727197 hi folks, âdaemonization's double-forkâ, double ? simple is enough ;) and unix is beautiful :p just to add my little irony word, sorry :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Baelde (dbaelde) Date: 2006-06-05 20:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=640545 I fixed the bug at revision 2480: the task scheduling thread was launched before the daemonization's double-fork, and thus not existing in the proper process. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=591456&aid=1494846&group_id=89802
