I liked using Mercurial, the biggest feature being the queues in my opinion. Git seems more complicated to use and does not have a standard queue implementation. Right now, I would advocate for sticking to a simple solution that isn't too bad.
Git would buy us local commits (more atomic, good) and better branch management (probably good, although we don't use them that much for now). Is it possible to have both for a while? We could sync a git with svn and see if we like to use it. -- David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Savonet-devl mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-devl
