Hi, On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Romain Beauxis <[email protected]> wrote: > I find the initialize idea more than satisfying.
Yes, I think it's reasonable, very few people would have to do it explicitly, and it should behave in expected ways in most cases. I just hope I didn't miss anything important; we'll see when I start implementing it (next week-end maybe). > I also wonder if that could help those who want to "reload" the liquidsoap > script.. Yes, it's related. It'll never be as simple as some people expect, but it'll open infinite possibilities. At least we'll be able to provide the right tools to people who want more, even if in most cases the complexity of doing things will outweigh their interest. In a few cases (e.g. perhaps radionomy) it could be useful though. > I have been wondering, for instance, whether a "parse" function could be > defined. It would simply be a function of the type string->[source] (or source > option if we have option), so it would fit in the idea of dynamic source > creation.. That sounds overly complicated. But we can very easily provide eval (of type (string)->unit). We can do it now independently of that clock business, even though it'll become more useful with it. Also, the ability to run code using the server would be useful too. David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Savonet-devl mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-devl
