Hey, On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Samuel Mimram <[email protected]> wrote: > What currently prevents us from releasing the 1.0?
Some things are too new and little used, notably the clock system: I don't like the current naming, and it's only been tested in a few cases. There are other things that need to be polished, most of which with associated tickets attached to the milestone on trac: priorities among decoders in order to deal with wrong detections; optimizing conversions such as audio_to_stereo and deciding whether we include them by default on single(), playlist(), etc; making type errors more readable. All those design choices are important since we'll have to be backward compatible in 1.x versions. Also, video and midi have only been tested on tiny examples, and there are signs of bugs. Finally, we haven't written any doc for a while, which is okay for a beta but not for a real release. I think that a beta version will help us to clarify all that, and get people to report issues, helping us to finalize a nice 1.0. Cheers, David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Savonet-devl mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-devl
