[
http://dev.sourcefabric.org/browse/LS-592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19340#action_19340
]
Samuel Mimram commented on LS-592:
----------------------------------
Ah yes, one last thing:
# list;;
- : [length: ∀'a 'b 'a 'a 'a 'a 'a 'a 'i 'a 'i 'a 'a . ((['a])->int),
mem: ∀'a 'b 'a 'a 'a 'a 'a 'a 'i 'a 'i 'a 'a . (('b,['b])->bool),
rev: ∀'a 'b 'a 'a 'a 'a 'a 'a 'i 'a 'i 'a 'a . ((['a])->['a]),
...
I don't think that it comes from my code but from the generalized variables
associated to builtins. Anyway, it's not incorrect (just very unnecessary...).
> Add support for extensible records
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LS-592
> URL: http://dev.sourcefabric.org/browse/LS-592
> Project: Liquidsoap
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Samuel Mimram
> Priority: Major
>
> We should add objects in Liquidsoap in order to justify the "dot" notation,
> and a first step in this direction would be to add (extensible) records.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://dev.sourcefabric.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Savonet-devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-devl
