On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Oliver Oli <[email protected]> wrote: > why is libaacplus a dependency in the stable 0.9.2 package, when the > aac implementation is known to be buggy?
I believe you're referring to the file PACKAGES.default in the full tarball for 0.9.2, and I agree with you. Really, this file should be renamed into PACKAGES.full as it enables everything even the unstable stuff. Note that PACKAGES.minimal is enough for most users, and could be read as PACKAGES.default -- except that everybody wants AAC+ these days... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, > a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. > Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Savonet-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users > -- David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
