On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Brandon Casci <[email protected]> wrote: > /user/bin/liquidsoap-0.9.0 > /user/bin/liquidsoap-0.9.2 > /user/bin/liquidsoap
Yes (although more probably /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin but it's up to you). Just be careful that the install with overwrite liquidsoap (you have to rename it after the install). Your second proposition is better to avoid that problem. > And just to reiterate, I may have to manually include version specific > utilities at the top of some of my scripts? If you install liquidsoap, you don't need to manually include version specific libraries. If you run liquidsoap-0.9.2 it will load /usr/lib/liquidsoap/0.9.2/utils.liq and so on... However, you probably want to split your script into several versions: 0.9.0 has a few differences with 0.9.2/3 (the snapshot versions which should have been named beta) and obviously 1.0 beta. The same script won't necessarily run with all versions. -- David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
