Hi, On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:35 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Before I implement this, referring to the issue of mp3 or ogg sources: > since either source is converted to pcm by liquidsoap, is there any > difference in the quality of resulting output between the two? I mean, > if I use mp3 sources, is the resultant quality better or worse than > if I use ogg sources?
The only difference in quality is the one you can expect from decoding the files. It's hard to compare quality between codecs, depending on the bitrate, etc. but roughly, if the MP3 and OGG files sound the same to you when you play them locally (or if you know they both have a good enough quality in themselves) then you can just use any format: once it's decoded it's the same for liquidsoap. > Btw, whenever you get a chance, please add Rural Catholic Radio to > your list of 'Proud Savonet (and very satisfied) users'! I had done it, just haven't published it yet. I didn't know how to describe you, because the name says it all. Now I've decided to quote what you just wrote: * "Rural catholic radio":http://http://www.ruralcatholicradio.com is a "proud (and very satisfied) savonet user". Cheers, -- David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
