Hi Jean,

How do you manage to run 140 Liquidsoap instances in parallel? Do you
mean on single machine, or you have farm? What is the maximum number
of instances you can run on single machine?

I have 15 on my quad-core dual-processor (2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
E5405 @ 2.00GHz,  8 GB RAM) and it nearly dies already :| Channels are
stuttering now and then and logs are bloated with "We must catchup..."
messages.

I should say though, that I decided to run all channels on a single
process at the moment, since having them separate, kills server even
faster :|


Davit Barbakadze




On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Jean-Francois Mauguit
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In fact we are running 140 Liquidsoap instances in parallel on our most 
> recent servers with harbor input on each instance. We don't have any problems 
> with it :-)
>
> HTH
>
> Jef
>
> On 10 Mar 2011, at 17:59, David Baelde wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's perfectly possible to have 16 liquidsoap, each one having an
>> harbor input. (In fact, radionomy does something similar.) You can
>> also have 8 liquidsoap instances, each one having two harbor inputs.
>> It does not matter if they are all active at the same time or not. All
>> that matters is that each one has a different port. So in the first
>> script you'll have for example input.harbor(port=8005,mount1), in the
>> second input.harbor(port=8006,mount2) etc. The mount names can be the
>> same, since they are on different harbor ports.
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users

Reply via email to