Hi, 2012/6/8 azerty88 <[email protected]>: > > Nope, it's no difference at all. > > Have a nice weekend ;)
I've tested it and I can confirm your issue. The problem is that for now, we consider that even if the input's buffer becomes very low, it may still be filled in time for the source to keep working. Thus, we do not detect end-of-track sufficiently in advance to have some data available for the transition, so the transition is skipped.. The only solution for now is to add a "min" buffer parameter, which adds an end of track when buffer becomes lower than this value.. Whatcha think of this? Would it fix your problem? Keep in mind that if your internet is not working ok, this may result in a lot of intempestive track switch back and forth.. Romain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
