Hi Daniel, Thanks for your reply. I have already tested airtime as a standalone solution and have rejected it because it can only output one station at a time (I require that the system have an unlimited number of stations so multiple nodes are feasible). However, this test was conducted prior to the NFS cluster setup, so I have not tried it with a network based storage solution. I shall look into this and revert.
Regards, Anand Kapre On 11-Jan-2013, at 4:53 PM, Daniel James <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Anand, >> I have setup a highly available NFS cluster with heartbeat and DRBD as >> the central storage for my music library. > > Sounds interesting! > >> I require the liquidsoap >> node(s) to keep a buffer (time/tracks is ok) of the music that will be >> played from the central library and also have a retry/timeout situation >> wherein it keeps looking for the central server. > > Airtime has a playout engine called pypo which takes care of this. It > downloads the files for the 24 hours of playout ahead to the local > cache, and then provides them to Liquidsoap at the appropriate time. > > It might be easier to get Airtime working with the main storage location > /media/music/ than to write something new. > > See: http://en.flossmanuals.net/airtime-en-2-2/media-folders/ > > Potentially you could have two or more nodes with both Airtime and > Liquidsoap on each node, using database replication. Let us know how you > get on :-) > Cheers! > > Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
