Wouldn't this be better handled at the network layer with static IP routes?
On Thursday, May 1, 2014, Peter Retep <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have two internet uplinks and want to send the LS icecast output to
> different remote icecast mounts.
> In this usecase we want to avoid that both streams send via the same
> network interface.
> Best case would be to have an option to select for example eth0 for
> stream1 and eth1 for stream2.
> I did not find anything related to this in the output.icecast <
> http://savonet.sourceforge.net/doc-svn/reference.html#output_icecast>
> options.
> How could I bind an icecast output stream to an network interface?
>
> Thanks, Peter
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
> unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Savonet-users mailing list
> [email protected] <javascript:;>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
