> 1 move to another LISP/Scheme dialect (still no decision or team) There was a discussion on this topic on LispNYC recently:
http://groups.google.com/a/lispnyc.org/group/lisp/browse_thread/thread/a66e9796e1e0ed1f/60dfb0b91326bf71?lnk=gst&q=guile#60dfb0b91326bf71 I've personally embedded TinyScheme in several projects, it's trivial to build. However Racket was voted the "Best Common-Lisp Development Environment" even though it's not CL! :-) ...plus it also runs on just about anything: x86, MIPS, ARM, PPC, SPARC I'm fully ignorant of Rep's history, just curious why Sawfish didn't go with Guile? - h On 06/10/2012 05:10 AM, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > There's no list, but stuff includes: > > > > near future: > > 1 move to another LISP/Scheme dialect (still no decision or team) > > 2 merge Sawfish-MMC (only partially in 1.9.0 due lack of time) > > 3 use XCB > > 4 use GTK3 (majorly effects rep-gtk. Needs to be ported to G-I > (gobject-introspection) in order to wrap GTK3 -- only a handfull of code > in Sawfish itself that would need a port) > > > > not-so-near future: > > - prepare for Wayland > > > > ... [2] might be the easiest, but the other 4 require much more manpower > than we currently have. > > > > Regards, > > Chris > -- Sawfish ML
