Hi folks, to put it plainly: there are no such plans. As Robby Zenz already said X isn't going anywhere, soon. Also we do not have enough man power or free time.
Regards, Chris On 23.12.2016 00:23, Trevor Cordes wrote: > Maybe this has been asked already, but I can't find it on google > anywhere... > > Is work being done on making a "sawfish for wayland"? Since wayland > doesn't access wm's like X does, it looks like "wm-like" things have to > be rewritten and merged somehow into wayland. > > It sounds like enlightenment is already working in wayland, so I > suppose it is possible. > > Please tell me we'll have sawfish for wayland? With the amount of > customization I've done in sawfish during the last decade my > productivity will go into the dumps if I have to throw it all away, > especially if the replacements (enlightenment) can reproduce the same > customizations. > > It looks like with Fedora 25 defaulting to wayland that in about 7-8 > months when F24 goes EOL I'll be forced into wayland whether I like it > or not. Even if (?) F25 allows you to switch to X (not X in wayland, > but pure X-only), all the desktop apps will start to be developed and > maintained with wayland in mind. That means even if I can stick with > X for a couple of Fedora revs, the X versions of things will get > buggier and no one on bz will care. Kind of like the 32-bit kernel > today. > > If anyone has some insights into these things, I'd love to hear them! > Anything to keep my hopes up. -- Signed: a happy X user that sees > absolutely no value-add for wayland in his happy 2D-only sawfish life. > -- Sawfish ML
