Hi Fransisco, definitely - the principles are the same. I used this a couple of years ago to bring a group from 0 to lvl 1... Of course what really tends to happen is that some parts actually move to 3+ whilst others only just make it to 1 level - and by the rules of CMM you can only claim the level that all processes have achieved.
This may be your confusion as SSE-CMM spends more time talking about this that CMMI Cheers, Bret At 07:00 PM 8/10/2007, Francisco Nunes wrote: >Dear list members. > >After reading SSE-CMM, I became confused whether >SSE-CMM can be used to improve their PAs like CMMI >does, i.e., both improve in continuous or in staged >way. > >Please, what are your opinions? > >Thank you. > >Yours sincerely, >Francisco. > > > Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único > sem limite de espaço para armazenamento! >http://br.mail.yahoo.com/ >_______________________________________________ >Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org >List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l >List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php >SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com) >as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community. >_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com) as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community. _______________________________________________
