I agree. Using Gradle, SBT or Maven as a build system has lots of advantages. I'm using SBT successfully.
Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2014 20:39:22 UTC+2 schrieb Nick Stanchenko: > > Yeah, it has been working that way for at least a year. But there are > several disadvantages to not using a build system, most notably (from the > top of my head): > > - No automatic dependency management. > - No command-line builds and tests. > - Builds are not easy to reproduce on a different system. Unless you > include the IDEA files in version control. But then you’ll get tons of > junk > in commits. > - More or less the same as the previous one: being dependent on a > particular IDE. > - No ProGuard caching (as in https://github.com/pfn/android-sdk-plugin > ). > > Perhaps there are others that I didn’t remember and/or list here. The only > advantage I see is that one doesn’t have to learn SBT (which can be hard, > but is rewarding in terms of productivity). Anyway, I’m convinced that in > 2014 a build system is a must :) > Just my 2¢. > > Nick > > On Saturday, May 17, 2014 7:14:31 PM UTC+1, Far Be wrote: >> >> I don know is it news for you, but it's possible to develop Android apps >> on Scala with Intellij 13 without 3d party plugins, SBT and Proguard. >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23696560/android-scala-intellij-13/23696561#23696561 >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-on-android" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
