The first is mostly fine (ACK), but for the second one I think Michael should weigh in.
You're adding clause= attributes to existing checks where that has been specifically identified as Michael's task: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/2012-September/001659.html If he hasn't gotten to the ones you've added, then maybe he can grant you an ACK. On 09/26/2012 10:43 AM, David Smith wrote: > added OCIL checks and clauses > > David Smith (2): > added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate > added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate > > RHEL6/input/system/accounts/pam.xml | 24 +++++++++++++ > RHEL6/input/system/accounts/physical.xml | 28 +++++++++++++++ > .../accounts/restrictions/password_expiration.xml | 36 +++++++++++++++---- > RHEL6/input/system/accounts/session.xml | 31 ++++++++++++----- > RHEL6/input/system/permissions/files.xml | 20 +++++----- > 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide _______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
