My thoughts: My RHEL5/6 servers have only a single NTP server avail (which
in turn receives time through GPS). It will just be an exception if "held
to a higher standard".


VR,
Brian Peake



On 10/25/12 2:28 PM, "Jeffrey Blank" <bl...@eclipse.ncsc.mil> wrote:

>We will certainly have rules available to that end.
>
>The question is whether you want it encoded as part a compliance
>enforcement regime for a wide variety of use cases.  Previous consensus
>discussion indicated that a single NTP server in an enclave was common
>practice, but that that system (acting as an NTP server) commonly used
>multiple sources for time.
>
>What would you want to enforce on all systems, as that is our constraint?
>
>Perhaps we could consider how Windows does it, and then decide whether
>we want to hold other platforms to a higher standard.
>
>
>
>
>On 10/25/2012 01:02 PM, Joe Wulf wrote:
>> I second that motion.
>> 
>> R,
>> -Joe
>> 
>>     *From:* Gary Gapinski <gapin...@nasa.gov>
>>     *To:* scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
>>     *Sent:* Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:38 PM
>>     *Subject:* NTP server(s)
>> 
>>     Dunno if this is worth a change or not, but the gentleman from
>>     Raytheon mentioned that the older STIG recommended several NTP
>>servers.
>> 
>>     Having been burned personally by a shady NTP server, as well as a
>>     shady local oscillator, best practice might be 3+ (to ensure
>>quorum).
>> 
>>     The current content (V-150) only requires that NTP be enabled (a
>>     very good thing) and that there is at least one server. (better than
>>     none).
>> 
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     scap-security-guide mailing list
>>     scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
>>     <mailto:scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org>
>>     https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> scap-security-guide mailing list
>> scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
>_______________________________________________
>scap-security-guide mailing list
>scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
>https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
>


_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide

Reply via email to