> Depends on how agnostic the content is. It would just be primarily for the RHEL/Fedora products and derivatives i.e CentOS, etc.
Gabe On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shawn Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > Depends on how agnostic the content is. > > E.g the webmin is also meant to work on Gentoo/Ubuntu in addition to RHEL, > so made sense for its own tree. > > -- > Shawn Wells > Director, Innovation Programs > [email protected] | 443.534.0130 > @shawndwells > > On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Gabe Alford <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry user keyboard error. > > I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with the BIND > and HTTP STIGs, and was wanting to add them back into the > scap-security-guide content when I am done. My question is should there be > a separate content tree like what we have for RHEL/6, RHEL/7, etc. but for > BIND and HTTP, or should the XCCDF be added to > RHEL/6/input/services/dns.xml and RHEL/6/input/services/http.xml? > > Thanks, > > Gabe > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Gabe Alford <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with >> the BIND and HTTP STIGs, and >> > > -- > SCAP Security Guide mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide > https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/ > > > -- > SCAP Security Guide mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide > https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/ >
-- SCAP Security Guide mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
