Hi,

I personally don't know WR Linux. Rules you have mentioned shouldn't be 
available
for offline scan (oscap-docker, oscap-chroot, ...) of any container (but should 
work when
you run oscap from inside of container).

Currently we don't have access to container /proc during offline scan so all 
checks what
needs it should be not available. Shadowing of passwords probably isn't 
available due to,
"non-compatibility" of password probe & offline scan - there are complications 
with nss
switch - some of accounts could be from LDAP, etc.

Zbynek



----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 8:15:19 PM
> Subject: investigating "notapplicable"
> 
> Hi folks
> 
> I'm trying to figure out how to go about investigating why "notapplicable"
> is returned.  Mostly, I'm working with a new directory for WR Linux.
> 
> However, I also see that for Fedora, there are four rules that are
> commented out with a comment:
> 
>     The following rules currently returns 'notapplicable' on Fedora container
>     Investigate why, fix the issues, and re-enable back once fixed
> 
> The specific rules that are commented out are:
> 
>     accounts_password_all_shadowed
>     root_path_no_dot
>     mount_option_dev_shm_nodev
>     mount_option_dev_shm_nosuid
> 
> When I tried to reproduce this, I find that accounts_password_all_shadowed
> passes on a vanilla Fedora 23 installation.  Maybe it's different on a
> container-based install than on an install on a plain old laptop.
> 
> root_path_no_dot appears to be malformed, with various pieces missing.
> 
> The other two don't show up in my output results at all.  Not sure why.
> They do appear to be present in the DS file, and I haven't yet found any
> reason to consider them malformed.
> 
> But my general question is about the procedure to go about this
> investigation.  Is there a document that gives hints about the
> best way to do this ?  I've looked for one, but haven't found it.
> What I've done so far is largely manual, and it has been somewhat
> awkward getting the results.  (Mostly, I've tried to investigate
> WR Linux, but the Fedora issues seemed like a good thing to use
> for more experience.)
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Enjoy!
> 
>                               -- radzy
> --
> SCAP Security Guide mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
> 
--
SCAP Security Guide mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/

Reply via email to