On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, at 9:08 AM, Watson Sato wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:57 PM Trevor Vaughan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Personally, I think that anything marked as %config should not be checked > > because they are allowed to vary anyway. > > > > I'm leaning towards ignoring config files in OVAL check, and making it > explicit in rule description. > And add a note with command that would output list of config files that do > not match their rpm hash, > in case you would like to review altered config files manually. > >
I think it's fine to ignore hash for config files, but permissions and ownership should still be verified, though that may be a separate rule. V/r, James Cassell _______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
