Thomas, Alex included this note on ticket 70:
> for systems with no clock or concept of time, > this could be made optional. Alternately, it could > simply be a counter, sufficient to show relative > ordering of events but not exact durations So it would actually not exclude any devices. J. On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:16:01PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > I think this is a poor WG1 thing; it would exclude embedded devices that may > not have access to any absolute timing information. > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:26:29AM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote: > > > I've added a ticket for just the current seconds: > > > > > > http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/ticket/70 > > > > > > I'll try to bring this up later in the WG1 discussion, if > > > not you'll have to wait for WG2. There's no reason > > > individual WG1 Schemes can't pick and choose WG2 modules > > > they want to use. > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > J. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Scheme-reports mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports > > _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
