On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Christopher Chittleborough < [email protected]> wrote:
> The 'century' values in the ISO chronology don't seem right. > If 1965 AD has century=19 in ISO, then 33 AD must have century=0 > so 43 BC would have century=-1, not 0. > I think it's confusing to call this "century", since it's one off from the ordinal number of the century. Perhaps "hundreds" or something that is more digity sounding?
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
