Three hours ago, John Cowan wrote:
> Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:
>
> > Would you be willing to write a little bit about how this proposal
> > compares to what different Scheme implementations already provide?
>
> AFAIK, only Kawa and MIT provide pathnames as a built-in, though
> there may be external packages that provide them on other systems.
> MIT is essentially CL in semantics, whereas Kawa is mostly about
> URIs.
Racket had a separate `path' type for a long time now. (Though it's
nowhere near the CL headache, and has no relation to uris.)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
