On Thu 05 May 2011 19:39, "Aaron W. Hsu" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 05 May 2011 11:43:53 -0400, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The brings up the question whether list control procedures can accept >> cyclic >> lists. > >> Should the following be valid? > > This is interesting, normally, `map' is specifically not allowed to take > circular lists and you get an error when trying to deal with them. > However, that is partly because of the restriction prior to this that all > arguments should be of the same length. Now, I think, there is an > opportunity to consider `map' in different terms. Whether we should do > this or not is still up to question. I don't know either, but do see srfi-1. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
