On 05/19/11 16:49, Andy Wingo wrote: > Suggestion: replace every instance of "an unspecified value", "value is > unspecified", "result is unspecified" and the like with "unspecified > values". This would permit the elegant approach of defining control > constructs with no logical value to return 0 values. This follows the > R6RS.
I was keen to do away with the strange dependence on precisely one value that was not specified, but it was voted to stick with a single undefined value being returned from things! See #68 at http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/WG1Ballot2Results > Andy ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
