Alex Shinn scripsit: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Table B.1 is swine before pearls; there's a back-handed compliment > > for you! Basically the whole document has a hearty schemey flavor, > > like a good traditional meal, yet with sawdust as dessert. > > > > Suggestion: move (most of) the features to a SRFI, where adequate > > space can be allotted to their definition. > > I agree it is out of place, but think we should move it to WG2.
I think it's important: it allows cond-expand to do the work done by SRFI 103 in the R6RS environment, and it allows it to be done by implementation feature, rather than just by implementation. I would not be averse to spelling out what the names mean. -- Where the wombat has walked, John Cowan <[email protected]> it will inevitably walk again. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
