> > I know it is a bit early to discuss this, but as I saw that this was > mentioned again recently in the scheme-reports mailing list (in the > context of module naming), I quickly wanted to write up a proposal of > how the WG1 and WG2 standards could be named in the future. >
Thank you for the proposal. I've filed ticket 231<http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/ticket/231> to track it. Alex and John, I have filed this ticket under "WG1 - Core" because I didn't see a pan-working group category into which to place it.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
