On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Alex Shinn wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Andre van Tonder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Alex Shinn wrote: >> >>> It's the environment programs start with. >>> >>> The result is that any program can be cut&paste into >>> an interactive REPL and still work, and any interactive >>> session can be saved and used as a program, so long >>> as it's prefixed with (import (scheme base)). >> >> Even if the program contains imports conflicting with prior imports or >> bindings in the REPL (assuming as John does a non-empty REPL), or >> redefinitions of bindings previously imported into the REPL? > > No, the reverse direction (interactive->batch) is not guaranteed.
I don't know what this means. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
