(Replying on the scheme-reports list as I am not a working group member.) Am 23.08.2011 02:15, schrieb John Cowan: > #237 Change "scheme" in module names to "rsn" or "rs11" or something else > "Scheme2011" is a bit long, but very clear.
I think that voting on a concrete name for the module namespace now is questionable, as (a.) it very much depends on the name that WG1 Scheme and the corresponding report will have, and (b.) whether WG2 will have module versioning (which would make a name with an embedded version - such as "scheme2011" - wouldn't be a particularly good choice). I think at least (a.) should be sorted out before this can be sensibly voted on. If I could vote, my preferences would be "rsn", then "rs11". (As future versions of the report hopefully won't have to bring such a large number of incompatibilities to its predecessor again, I don't think that putting the version in the name is all that important, or even desirable.) Regards, Denis _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
