Two hours ago, John Cowan wrote: > > So it is not invasive and breaks nothing except user code like > > (define x (set! y 32)) > > which has no portable meaning in any case (it will not work in > Racket, e.g.).
Sure it does.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
