Hi, I asked about this in the context of "include" before [1]:
How modules are mapped to the filesystem, and how they are located by "include", is unspecified in R7RS, and that's a good thing. However, we might want to give some recommendations so that we have a certain amount of compatibility between implementations. More specifically, we could recommend in the hierarchical filesystem case to search for a module named "(foo bar ... baz)" by loooking up "foo/bar/.../baz.(scm|ss|sls|whatever)" relative to a implementation-defined set of directories. I don't know where this should go, though. Will R7RS have a document like the R6RS "Non-Normative Appendices" published with it? That would be a perfect fit. What do you think? Regards, Denis [1] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/pipermail/scheme-reports/2011-August/001296.html _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
