John Cowan scripsit: > > The fourth technical mistake came in the survey of current practice, > > which says that Chez Scheme and Ikarus return #t but Larceny returns > > #f. The ballot question isn't clear on the expression involved, but > > all three of the systems I mentioned implement the R6RS semantics. > > I implemented the simplest possible test: I asked the REPLs for the > values of (eqv? +nan.0 +nan.0) and (eqv? +nan.0 0.0).
But apparently I transcribed my results wrongly: all of Chez, Ikarus, Larceny, Ypsilon, IronScheme, and Mosh return #t to the first test and #f to the second. -- They do not preach John Cowan that their God will rouse them [email protected] A little before the nuts work loose. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan They do not teach that His Pity allows them --Rudyard Kipling, to drop their job when they damn-well choose. "The Sons of Martha" _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
