On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/29/2011 05:25 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote: > >> On a system that that invokes a compiler on the argument of EVAL, the >> compiler >> may depend on the textual representation of the code '(cons 1 2). It may >> even >> do certain optimizations and rewritings based on the textual representation. >> Again, having procedure objects in here confuses levels and can cause >> problems >> for such a compiler. > > Does it really? Can anyone point to an implementation of EVAL that can't > cope with this?
I don't think Larceny's eval can cope with this. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
