On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Jussi Piitulainen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do all these need to remain in the language? In (scheme base)?
We should put them somewhere for compatibility, but I definitely think everything but the one and two depth combinations should be removed from (scheme base). Their use is generally a code smell. People should use destructuring, records, or SRFI-1 first..tenth accessors. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
