Alex Shinn scripsit: > A gap buffer is a pretty inefficient choice for text buffers.
It trades off space for time, that's true. > There is plenty of prior art for various buffer representations, > including several Scheme text editors, but there are a lot of > API choices and tradeoffs involved. This is an area people > should be exploring and writing multiple alternatives for > Snow. It's definitely not ready for standardization. Well, you know what to do -- vote against it. -- John Cowan [email protected] http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"? _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
