On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Arthur A. Gleckler <[email protected]> wrote: > > | Page 26, section 5.5.1: library name can contain "unsigned exact > | integers" -- maybe "nonnegative" instead of "unsigned"? Also, are > | there limits on which integers an implementation can represent > | exactly, i.e. can I be sure that 802000 is exact? > > I've made the change to "nonnegative."
Actually, I can't think why we need to exclude negative integers. The rationale was specifically for the case of numbered standards, RFCs, SRFIs and the like, in which case you generally don't have negative values, but then we can't make the old R-1RS jokes... -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
