Peter Bex scripsit: > One question though: what is (string->number "#i1/0") supposed to return? > I think +inf.0 is sane, but you could probably also make a case for #f.
I think +inf.0 is correct, though many Schemes do return #f. > Suggestion: Improve the wording in string->number's description [details snipped] Ticket #363 filed. Note that string->number can still throw an exception such as "out of memory". -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] Would your name perchance be surname Puppet, given name Sock? --Rick Moen _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
