There is also the grammar as it is laid out in TSPL3: http://scheme.com/tspl3/grammar.html#./grammar:h0
Which is similar to what Mr. Robbin's wrote above, save for hoisting the '+' & '-' rules into the complex production above. On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew Robbins scripsit: > > > On a more serious note, is there any harm in rewriting > > the current syntax a little more clearly? For example: > > I like this proposal. I have asked a friend of mine who knows how to > use proof engines to see if this grammar is equivalent to the existing > grammar. > > -- > John Cowan [email protected] http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > Statistics don't help a great deal in making important decisions. > Most people have more than the average number of feet, but I'm not about > to start a company selling shoes in threes. --Ross Gardler > > _______________________________________________ > Scheme-reports mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports > -- ==== Q. How many Prolog programmers does it take to change a lightbulb? A. No.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
