Stefan Edwards scripsit: > I guess what I'm driving at is for the standard to explain how to treat > items that fail the above instance of > translation into appropriate values, in some standard way.
I don't see how: the issue seems about as implementation-dependent as anything could be. What approach should the standard provide for converting Plan 9 error strings into the far more common Windows/Posix numbers from 1 to 255? (I assume that APE has a reverse convention, but I can't find any documentation of it online.) -- "Repeat this until 'update-mounts -v' shows no updates. John Cowan You may well have to log in to particular machines, hunt down [email protected] people who still have processes running, and kill them." _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
