On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Marc Feeley <[email protected]> wrote: > This has probably been mentionned before, but the second parameter of > string-fill! on page 45 has the name "char", but the text mentions the > parameter "fill". For consistency with the other ...-fill! procedures, it > should be called "fill".
Yes, this was caught and fixed earlier, thanks. > Moreover, the ...-fill! procedures require that both start and end be absent > or present. Couldn't the end parameter default to the length of the > sequence, as is the case for other subsequence operations? This would be > more consistent, and easier to remember. We've also made this extension. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
