Marc Feeley scripsit:

> For this reason, the procedure port-open? is not very informative for
> bidirectional ports.  It would be better to separate this into two
> procedures so that each direction can be tested independently:
> 
>   (input-port-open? port)
>   (output-port-open? port)

Ballot ticket #445 filed.

-- 
A: "Spiro conjectures Ex-Lax."                  John Cowan
Q: "What does Pat Nixon frost her cakes with?"  [email protected]
  --"Jeopardy" for generative semanticists      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Reply via email to