On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Jussi Piitulainen <[email protected]> wrote: > At the page break 73-74, I wonder how appropriate it is to promote the > old Indiana repository. Shouldn't it be labelled historical and > not-up-to-date-in-any-way if it's mentioned at all? I'm sure > schemers.org links to it, and schemers.org seems to be the good > starting point now.
We'll revisit this. I actually wanted to expand that section further but there aren't a lot of non-partisan resources out there. I think the freenode #scheme IRC channel may be worth mentioning. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
