Alaric Snell-Pym <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the formal semantics are a NEAT FEATURE, so they should be kept > current and valid and useful. I'm rather rusty now, but I've been quite > familiar with formal semantics in the past, so I can try and take a look > at this, but I'd want at least one other person to help so I have > somebody to discuss bits I get stuck on, and so we can cross-check each > other to make sure we're not doing anything silly, before it goes out > for review. Any takers?
I am currently in the process of drafting something related to this that I hope to have out soon. So, I am a taker, of sorts. -- Aaron W. Hsu | [email protected] | http://www.sacrideo.us Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
