Alex Shinn <[email protected]> wrote: > There are two motivational factors behind write-simple: > speed and the desire to generate output that does not > use the reader label notation. We both agree that > write-simple is necessary, you're just claiming that > speed is not as much an issue.
See my comment on the ticket related to this, but it is possible to have all three (unsafe, safe, shared) in a single WRITE if we use a parameter to indicate which is wanted. This has precedent in some Scheme systems. Moreover, I am not convinced that we need the unsafe version at all, just so long as we have one that only uses labels when there are cycles. This is the default on Schemes that I have seen which implement the parameter approach. -- Aaron W. Hsu | [email protected] | http://www.sacrideo.us Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
